Verified Document

Prisoner Rights In Insurrections Chapter

¶ … Legality of Prison Riots Once a riot is quelled in the situation that is described in this particular assignment, there are a couple of different charges that the state can bring against the prisoners. The most salient of these charges is hostage taking. It is unlawful for individuals to take another as a hostage, in much the same way that it is unlawful for those individuals to take a group of individuals as hostages. Thus, the inmates that participate in taking the hostage and in maintaining the hostage are certainly liable to be charged with hostage taking. It is critical to note, however, that the individuals who participate in the riot and who do not directly partake in the actions of taking or maintaining the hostages cannot be charged for this particular crime.

Still, there are other charges that can be brought against these inmates -- whether or not they actively partook in holding some of the guards hostage. Perhaps the most eminent of these charges is assault. Additionally, these inmates can also be charged with battery if they do not use a weapon to inflict violence against the guards. However, if there is any form of weapon involved...

Another charge that inmates might be assigned after the riot is over is unlawful assembly. In prisons, there are certain times and places where inmates are designated to assemble. Some of these times and places include within a cafeteria for lunch time, or out on the yard for recreational activities. However, whether or not the assembly is deemed lawful pertains to a number of different factors. If the guards instruct the prisoners to leave the yard, for instance, their refusal to do so (and subsequent rioting in there) is grounds for them to get charged with unlawful assembly.
There are a couple of things the government has to do in order to prove that an inmate should be convicted of hostage taking. Firstly, the government must prove that the inmate did in fact take a hostage. Doing so requires proof that the inmate did indeed take a hostage. Doing so requires detaining an individual under threat or coercion against his or her will. Moreover, the purpose of that detainment typically has to be in order to negotiate or to compel a…

Sources used in this document:
References

Massachusetts Lawyer Weekly. (2013). Commonwealth v. Spearin. http://masslawyersweekly.com / Retrieved from http://masslawyersweekly.com/fulltext-opinions/2006/05/01/commonwealth-v-spearin/

District Attorney's Association. (2015). Commonwealth v. Spearin. www.mass.gov Retrieved from http://www.mass.gov/mdaa/court-decisions/by-topic/jury-trial/jury-instruction/hostage-taking/commonwealth-v-spearin.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Political Unification of Italy and
Words: 2686 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

As Metternich was forced to resign, the German princes hastened to make peace in order to avoid political experiments like the ones that were developed by the republicans and socialists in France. They introduced, by appointing liberal ministers, civic and political reforms, guaranteeing the powers of the legislature and citizen rights. However, the most important step was the attempt to achieve political unification, by founding a National Assembly that would

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now